Using negatively geared property has been a favorite of Australians to build wealth for a long time – and it is easy to see why with proven capital growth, the easy ability to borrow to fund property purchases, and a nice big tax refund at the end of the year.
But is this strategy still the best option now that SMSFs can borrow to acquire residential and commercial property? This article will compare each strategy and provide some insight to enable you to make a better-informed decision about your next (or your first) investment property purchase.
First Match – Financing:
To finance the purchase of your investment property, you are going to need to borrow. This means paying a visit to our friends at the banks. In Australia, the home lending market is dominated by the big players – and in regards to the loans available to SMSFs, it is no different. Leading the pack are Westpac, NAB, and St George. CBA also has a lending product – however, it is more restrictive than the others.
Compared to a normal investment property loan, the LVRs available when obtaining an SMSF loan are slightly reduced – typically being 72% – 75% for residential property and 65% for commercial property. This will mean you will typically need a larger deposit if buying via an SMSF – however, for most people, this is not going to be a problem as you will likely have more available in your super than sitting in your savings account.
In addition to the lower LVRs, the establishment and legal fees charged by the banks are significantly higher for a SMSF loan compared to a typical investment property loan. Once again, these additional costs can be offset by the additional superannuation monies you have available – i.e.; you don’t have to fund it out of your own pocket.
When it comes to the lending side – borrowing via a SMSF is always more expensive than a typical investment property loan, both in terms of the setup.
Related Articles :
- The 10+1 Paths To Vibrant Healthy Skin At Any Age – How To Make 2013 Your Best Year For Beauty Ever
- Computer Tips If Your System is Running Low on Virtual Memory
- Do You Want to Know the Six Easy Steps Into Your First Investment Property?
- Free SEO Tips – How to Optimize Your Site in Two Hours
- Are Inventory Financing Lenders and P O Factoring Solutions Your Best Business Financing Bet?
Negative Gearing: 1 SMSF: Nil
There is a compromise here, though. If you personally have enough equity available in other properties to fund some or all of the borrowings the SMSF requires to complete the purchase of a property, you can become the bank and lend to the SMSF. This is referred to as ‘member financing’ and can be used as a replacement or complementary to bank financing. This method substantially reduces borrowing costs.
Second Match – Taxation:
You probably wonder what the taxation consequences are when comparing negative gearing against the SMSF purchasing a similar property? It works like this: A property is negatively geared when the total taxable income generated is less than the total deductible expenses relating to it.
For example, if your negatively geared property were costing you an additional $200 per week over the period one financial year, your overall tax deduction (negative rental income) would be around $10,000. If your marginal income tax rate is 30% + 1.5% Medicare, you would expect a refund of around $3,150 at the end of the year. Overall you are still out of pocket by around $7,000.
If your SMSF held a property with the same costs, you could salary sacrifice $200 of pre-tax income to cover the loan repayments and other property-related expenses. You do not pay income tax on any amount you salary sacrifice, so if that amount totals $10,000 per year – then just like the above example your tax saving is the same – but instead of paying the ATO week to week and then getting a refund at the end of the year, you are simply not paying tax on that money at all.
Now, as you may know, any employer ‘concessional contributions’ such as salary sacrifice into super are taxable by the super fund at 15%. However, the SMSF is also entitled to the same deductions relating to the property that you are – meaning there will be a nil tax impact.
So, when you compare the strategies, the week-to-week tax impact is the same. However, the SMSF is the clear winner when it becomes time to sell the property and realize the capital gain. If the property is held for more than twelve months, the SMSF pays 10% on the capital gain – so if the property were sold for $150k more than you paid, the SMSF would pay $15k in capital gains tax. By comparison, if you held the property in your personal name and you have the income of a wage of $80k, the tax and Medicare payable would be just under $30k.
But wait – there’s more! If you hold the property long-term in your SMSF and commence a pension when you reach age 55, all the income (such as rent) and capital gains on assets used to support that pension (such as the property) are tax exempt. If $15k tax is better than $30k tax, then $0 tax is the Holy Grail.
Negative Gearing: 1 SMSF: 1
Third Match – Access to Funds:
Another important consideration is access to funds. Monies contributed to super must stay in super until at least age 55. By comparison, if you profit from the sale of an investment property held in your own name, the proceeds can be used to pay off your mortgage, credit cards, car loans, pay for a holiday, or buy a boat.
However, if your goal is to continuously build up a property portfolio to provide income for your retirement and intend to re-invest any gains you make into more properties, the fact that you can’t access the funds becomes less relevant.
As I mentioned, super monies must stay in super until age 55. Like me, that time is a long way off – but what about your parents? Chances are they are a lot closer or more likely over that magical age already.
There is a way for your parents to help you purchase your first investment property while simultaneously generating a healthy return on their money AND providing the means for you to legitimately unlock some of the equity you will build up in your SMSF investment property. To find out more about this fantastic strategy, you need to read my other articles and check out my blog via the link at the bottom of this article.
Negative Gearing: 2 SMSF: 2
Fourth Match – Deposit:
As previously mentioned, like most average Australians, you probably have more available in your superannuation than you do in your personal savings account.
Utilizing a SMSF to access this money as the deposit for an investment property means two things:
You can buy your investment property sooner
With the higher deposit, you are more likely to be able to buy a property that is cash-flow positive
Saving money for investment purposes is hard; it takes a long time, the earnings on those savings are typically low, and you get taxed on that interest to boot! Utilising the super means you can get into the market sooner and start to build your wealth sooner.
So you are probably wondering how much is enough to get started? Well – it depends! Refer to my other article, “Self Managed Superannuation Fund (SMSFs) – How Much is Required to Set a SMSF Up?” for more information about how much is enough.